<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Tracy R. Holcombe</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Elizabeth Bell</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Matthew L. Carlson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Gino Graziano</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Melinda Lamb</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Steven S. Seefeldt</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jeffrey T. Morisette</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Catherine S. Jarnevich</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;We assessed the ability of climatic, environmental, and anthropogenic variables to predict areas of high-risk for plant invasion and consider the relative importance and contribution of these predictor variables by considering two spatial scales in a region of rapidly changing climate. We created predictive distribution models, using Maxent, for three highly invasive plant species (Canada thistle, white sweetclover, and reed canarygrass) in Alaska at both a regional scale and a local scale. Regional scale models encompassed southern coastal Alaska and were developed from topographic and climatic data at a 2&amp;nbsp;km (1.2&amp;nbsp;mi) spatial resolution. Models were applied to future climate (2030). Local scale models were spatially nested within the regional area; these models incorporated physiographic and anthropogenic variables at a 30&amp;nbsp;m (98.4&amp;nbsp;ft) resolution. Regional and local models performed well (AUC values &amp;gt; 0.7), with the exception of one species at each spatial scale. Regional models predict an increase in area of suitable habitat for all species by 2030 with a general shift to higher elevation areas; however, the distribution of each species was driven by different climate and topographical variables. In contrast local models indicate that distance to right-of-ways and elevation are associated with habitat suitability for all three species at this spatial level. Combining results from regional models, capturing long-term distribution, and local models, capturing near-term establishment and distribution, offers a new and effective tool for highlighting at-risk areas and provides insight on how variables acting at different scales contribute to suitability predictions. The combinations also provides easy comparison, highlighting agreement between the two scales, where long-term distribution factors predict suitability while near-term do not and vice versa.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1614/IPSM-D-13-00071.1</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Weed Science Society of America</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Cross-scale assessment of potential habitat shifts in a rapidly changing climate</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>