<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Terry Walshe</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Michael C. Runge</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;In this chapter, we discuss the role of objectives and alternative actions in framing a natural resource management decision problem, with particular attention to thresholds. We outline a number of considerations in developing objectives and measurable attributes, including when utility thresholds may be needed to express the decision-makers&amp;rsquo; values.We also discuss the development of a set of alternative actions, and how these might give rise to decision thresholds, particularly when the predictive models contain ecological thresholds. Framing of a decision problem plays a central role in decision analysis because it helps determine the needs for a predictive ecological model, the type of solution method required, and the value and structure of a monitoring system.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1007/978-1-4899-8041-0_3</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Springer New York</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Identifying objectives and alternative actions to frame a decision problem.</dc:title>
  <dc:type>chapter</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>