<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Blake A. Grisham</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Clint W. Boal</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>David A. Haukos</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Christian A. Hagen</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2013</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;The distribution and range of lesser prairie-chicken (&lt;i&gt;Tympanuchus pallidicinctus&lt;/i&gt;) has been reduced by &amp;gt;90% since European settlement of the Great Plains of North America. Currently, lesser prairie-chickens occupy 3 general vegetation communities: sand sagebrush (&lt;i&gt;Artemisia filifolia&lt;/i&gt;), sand shinnery oak (&lt;i&gt;Quercus havardii&lt;/i&gt;), and mixed-grass prairies juxtaposed with Conservation Reserve Program grasslands. As a candidate for protection under the Endangered Species Act, there is a need for a synthesis that characterizes habitat structure rangewide. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis of vegetation characteristics at nest sites and brood habitats to determine whether there was an overall effect (Hedges' &lt;i&gt;d&lt;/i&gt;) of habitat selection and to estimate average (95% CI) habitat characteristics at use sites. We estimated effect sizes (d&lt;sub&gt;&lt;i&gt;i&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/sub&gt;) from the difference between use (nests and brood sites) and random sampling sites for each study (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 14), and derived an overall effect size (d&lt;sub&gt;++&lt;/sub&gt;). There was a general effect for habitat selection as evidenced by low levels of variation in effect sizes across studies and regions. There was a small to medium effect (d&lt;sub&gt;++&lt;/sub&gt;) = 0.20-0.82) of selection for greater vertical structure (visual obstruction) by nesting females in both vegetation communities, and selection against bare ground (d&lt;sub&gt;++&lt;/sub&gt; = 0.20-0.58). Females with broods exhibited less selectivity for habitat components except for vertical structure. The variation of d&lt;sub&gt;++&lt;/sub&gt; was greater during nesting than brooding periods, signifying a seasonal shift in habitat use, and perhaps a greater range of tolerance for brood-rearing habitat. The overall estimates of vegetation cover were consistent with those provided in management guidelines for the species.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1002/wsb.313</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Wildlife Society</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>A meta-analysis of lesser prairie-chicken nesting and brood-rearing habitats: implications for habitat management</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>