<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Peter S. Coates</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Michael L. Casazza</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Shawn Espinosa</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>David J. Delehanty</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Zachary B. Lockyer</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2015</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Identifying links between micro-habitat selection and wildlife reproduction is imperative to population persistence and recovery. This information is particularly important for landscape species such as greater sage-grouse (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Centrocercus urophasianus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;; sage-grouse). Although this species has been widely studied, because environmental factors can affect sage-grouse populations, local and regional studies are crucial for developing viable conservation strategies. We studied the habitat-use patterns of 71 radio-marked sage-grouse inhabiting an area affected by wildfire in the Virginia Mountains of northwestern Nevada during 2009&amp;ndash;2011 to determine the effect of micro-habitat attributes on reproductive success. We measured standard vegetation parameters at nest and random sites using a multi-scale approach (range&amp;thinsp;=&amp;thinsp;0.01&amp;ndash;15,527&amp;thinsp;ha). We used an information-theoretic modeling approach to identify environmental factors influencing nest-site selection and survival, and determine whether nest survival was a function of resource selection. Sage-grouse selected micro-sites with greater shrub canopy cover and less cheatgrass (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Bromus tectorum&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;) cover than random sites. Total shrub canopy, including sagebrush (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Artemisia&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;spp.) and other shrub species, at small spatial scales (0.8&amp;thinsp;ha and 3.1&amp;thinsp;ha) was the single contributing selection factor to higher nest survival. These results indicate that reducing the risk of wildfire to maintain important sagebrush habitats could be emphasized in sage-grouse conservation strategies in Nevada. Managers may seek to mitigate the influx of annual grass invasion by preserving large intact sagebrush-dominated stands with a mixture of other shrub species. For this area of Nevada, the results suggest that &amp;ge;40% total shrub canopy cover in sage-grouse nesting areas could yield improved reproductive success.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1002/jwmg.899</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Wildlife Society</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Nest-site selection and reproductive success of greater sage-grouse in a fire-affected habitat of northwestern Nevada</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>