<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Elizabeth S. Cochran</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Angela Chung</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Carl M. Christensen</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jesse F. Lawrence</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Battalgazi Yildirim</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2015</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Over the past two decades, there have been several initiatives to create volunteer‐based seismic networks. The Personal Seismic Network, proposed around 1990, used a short‐period seismograph to record earthquake waveforms using existing phone lines (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a id="xref-ref-13-1" class="xref-bibr" href="http://srl.geoscienceworld.org/content/86/3/856.full#ref-13"&gt;Cranswick and Banfill, 1990&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a id="xref-ref-14-1" class="xref-bibr" href="http://srl.geoscienceworld.org/content/86/3/856.full#ref-14"&gt;Cranswick&lt;i&gt;et&amp;nbsp;al.&lt;/i&gt;, 1993&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;). NetQuakes (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a id="xref-ref-26-1" class="xref-bibr" href="http://srl.geoscienceworld.org/content/86/3/856.full#ref-26"&gt;Luetgert&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;et&amp;nbsp;al.&lt;/i&gt;, 2010&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;) deploys triaxial Micro‐Electromechanical Systems (MEMS) sensors in private homes, businesses, and public buildings where there is an Internet connection. Other seismic networks using a dense array of low‐cost MEMS sensors are the Community Seismic Network (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a id="xref-ref-9-1" class="xref-bibr" href="http://srl.geoscienceworld.org/content/86/3/856.full#ref-9"&gt;Clayton&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;et&amp;nbsp;al.&lt;/i&gt;, 2012&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a id="xref-ref-22-1" class="xref-bibr" href="http://srl.geoscienceworld.org/content/86/3/856.full#ref-22"&gt;Kohler&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;et&amp;nbsp;al.&lt;/i&gt;, 2013&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;) and the Home Seismometer Network (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a id="xref-ref-21-1" class="xref-bibr" href="http://srl.geoscienceworld.org/content/86/3/856.full#ref-21"&gt;Horiuchi&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;et&amp;nbsp;al.&lt;/i&gt;, 2009&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;). One main advantage of combining low‐cost MEMS sensors and existing Internet connection in public and private buildings over the traditional networks is the reduction in installation and maintenance costs (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a id="xref-ref-23-1" class="xref-bibr" href="http://srl.geoscienceworld.org/content/86/3/856.full#ref-23"&gt;Koide&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;et&amp;nbsp;al.&lt;/i&gt;, 2006&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;). In doing so, it is possible to create a dense seismic network for a fraction of the cost of traditional seismic networks (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a id="xref-ref-16-1" class="xref-bibr" href="http://srl.geoscienceworld.org/content/86/3/856.full#ref-16"&gt;D&amp;rsquo;Alessandro and D&amp;rsquo;Anna, 2013&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a id="xref-ref-15-1" class="xref-bibr" href="http://srl.geoscienceworld.org/content/86/3/856.full#ref-15"&gt;D&amp;rsquo;Alessandro, 2014&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a id="xref-ref-17-1" class="xref-bibr" href="http://srl.geoscienceworld.org/content/86/3/856.full#ref-17"&gt;D&amp;rsquo;Alessandro&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;et&amp;nbsp;al.&lt;/i&gt;, 2014&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1785/0220140218</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Seismological Society of America</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>On the reliability of Quake-Catcher Network earthquake detections</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>