<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Kevin D. Lafferty</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2015</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;A recent series of studies on tagged sea otters (&lt;i&gt;Enhydra lutris nereis&lt;/i&gt;) challenges the hypothesis that sea otters are sentinels of a dirty ocean, in particular, that pet cats are the main source of exposure to &lt;i&gt;Toxoplasma gondii&lt;/i&gt; in central California. Counter to expectations, sea otters from unpopulated stretches of coastline are less healthy and more exposed to parasites than city-associated otters. Ironically, now it seems that spillover from wildlife, not pets, dominates spatial patterns of disease transmission.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.05.005</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Australian Society for Parasitology</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Sea otter health: challenging a pet hypothesis</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>