<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>R. Sleeman</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Charles R. Hutt</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Lind S. Gee</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Adam T. Ringler</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Seismometer self-noise is usually not considered when selecting and using seismic waveform data in scientific research as it is typically assumed that the self-noise is negligibly small compared to seismic signals. However, instrumental noise is part of the noise in any seismic record, and in particular, at frequencies below a few mHz, the instrumental noise has a frequency-dependent character and may dominate the noise. When seismic noise itself is considered as a carrier of information, as in seismic interferometry (e.g., Chaput et al.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="CitationRef"&gt;&lt;a href="http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-3-642-36197-5_175-1#CR5"&gt;2012&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;), it becomes extremely important to estimate the contribution of instrumental noise to the recordings.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_175-1</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Seismometer Self-Noise and Measuring Methods</dc:title>
  <dc:type>chapter</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>