<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>E. Joshua Rigler</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Antti Pulkkinen</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Pete Riley</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Jeffrey J. Love</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2015</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;An examination is made of the hypothesis that the statistics of magnetic storm maximum intensities are the realization of a lognormal stochastic process. Weighted least squares and maximum likelihood methods are used to fit lognormal functions to −&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;s&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;storm time maxima for years 1957–2012; bootstrap analysis is used to established confidence limits on forecasts. Both methods provide fits that are reasonably consistent with the data; both methods also provide fits that are superior to those that can be made with a power‐law function. In general, the maximum likelihood method provides forecasts having tighter confidence intervals than those provided by weighted least squares. From extrapolation of maximum likelihood fits: a magnetic storm with intensity exceeding that of the 1859 Carrington event, −&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;s&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;≥ 850&amp;nbsp;nT, occurs about 1.13 times per century and a wide 95% confidence interval of [0.42, 2.41] times per century; a 100&amp;nbsp;year magnetic storm is identified as having a −&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;s&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;≥ 880&amp;nbsp;nT (greater than Carrington) but a wide 95% confidence interval of [490, 1187] nT.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1002/2015GL064842</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Geophysical Union</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>On the lognormality of historical magnetic-storm intensity statistics: Implications for extreme-event probabilities</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>