<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Robert G. Eppinger</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>David L. Fey</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Karen D. Kelley</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>S. A. Giles</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Steven M. Smith</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2009</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Soil samples were collected in 2007 and 2008 along three traverses across the giant Pebble Cu-Au-Mo porphyry deposit. Within each soil pit, four subsamples were collected following recommended protocols for each of ten commonly-used and proprietary leach/digestion techniques. The significance of geochemical patterns generated by these techniques was classified by visual inspection of plots showing individual element concentration by each analytical method along the 2007 traverse. A simple matrix by element versus method, populated with a value based on the significance classification, provides a method for ranking the utility of methods and elements at this deposit. The interpretation of a complex multi-element dataset derived from multiple analytical techniques is challenging. An example of vanadium results from a single leach technique is used to illustrate the several possible interpretations of the data.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Association of Applied Geochemists</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>An orientation soil survey at the Pebble Cu-Au-Mo porphyry deposit, Alaska</dc:title>
  <dc:type>text</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>