<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Justin G. Mychek-Londer</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>James S. Diana</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Wendylee Stott</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Charles P. Madenjian</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>David B. Bunnell</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2012</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;As the only extant deepwater &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;cisco&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; in Lake Michigan, bloater is currently at record low levels of abundance.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Several mechanisms to regulate their recruitment have been proposed, including skewed sex ratios, predation on their larvae by adult alewife, and climatic factors during early life history stages, but none has unequivocal support.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In this research, we evaluated an alternative mechanism of egg predation that was supported by an inverse relationship between bloater recruitment and biomass of slimy &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;, which are known to be effective egg predators.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;To that end, we used a combination of field sampling, laboratory experiments, and modeling to estimate the proportion of bloater eggs consumed by &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpins&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; each year between 1973 and 2008.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Monthly field sampling between January through May 2009-2010 (when bloater eggs were incubating) offshore of Frankfort (Michigan), Sturgeon Bay (Wisconsin), Two Rivers (Wisconsin), and Muskegon (Michigan) provided &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;benthivore&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; diets for subsequent laboratory processing.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Identification and enumeration of stomach contents and subsequent genetic analyses of eggs revealed that the mean proportion of bloater eggs in slimy &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; diets (N = 1016) equaled 0.04.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Bloater eggs also were consumed by deepwater &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpins&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; (N = 699) at a slightly lower mean proportion (0.02), and only one round goby diet among 552 enumerated revealed a bloater egg.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Based on the diet results, we developed daily ration models to estimate consumption for both deepwater and slimy &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpins&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;We conducted feeding experiments to estimate gastric evacuation (GEVAC) for water temperatures ranging 2-5 °C, similar to those observed during egg incubation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;GEVAC rates equaled 0.0115/ h for slimy &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; and 0.0147/h for deepwater &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;, and did not vary between 2.7 and 5.1 °C for either species or between prey types (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Mysis &lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;relicta&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt; and fish eggs) for slimy &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Index of fullness [(g prey/g fish weight)100%] was estimated from &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpins&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; sampled in bottom trawls in the same seasons and years as the diets, and varied with fish size (averaging 1.93% and 1.85% for slimy and deepwater &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpins&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;, respectively).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Estimates of daily consumption ranged from 0.2-0.8% of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; body weight.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Annual estimates of bloater egg consumption predicted higher values for deepwater &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; than slimy &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; between 1973 and 2005.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;This pattern was reversed in 2006, 2008, 2009, 2010 as slimy &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; abundance increased while that of deepwater &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; declined.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;The sum of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; consumption of bloater eggs exceeded 25% of bloater population egg production early (1975-1980) and late (2008-2010) in the time series.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Despite the strong field pattern implicating egg predation by slimy &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;, our consumption models failed to fully support this hypothesis.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In particular, our results were unable to explain why bloater recruitment was relatively poor during 1995-2005 when the proportion of bloater eggs consumed was very low (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;u&gt;&amp;lt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;span&gt; 0.06).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;The results did, however, demonstrate that bloater recruitment was consistently poor when the proportion of eggs consumed was relatively high.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In conclusion, consumption by native &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;benthivores&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; can be a contributing factor to poor recruitment of bloater, especially when slimy &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; reach high levels of abundance.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;This result exemplifies the importance of ecosystem-based fishery management, given that the maintenance of healthy lake trout populations in the Great Lakes should control the abundance of slimy &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="SpellE"&gt;sculpin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; egg predators.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;In addition, future research will be required to fully understand the primary bottleneck to bloater recruitment in Lake Michigan so that efforts to stock and restore bloater in Lake Ontario have a greater probability of resulting in naturalized and sustainable populations.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Great Lakes Fishery Commission</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Evaluating the negative effect of benthic egg predators on bloater recruitment in northern Lake Michigan</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>