<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Dorothy M. Chase</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Constance L. McKibben</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Ronald J. Pascho</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1998</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Ovarian fluid samples from naturally infected chinook salmon (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Oncorhynchus tshawytscha&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;) were examined for the presence of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Renibacterium salmoninarum&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt; by the membrane-filtration fluorescent antibody test (MF-FAT), an antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). On the basis of the MF-FAT, 64% (66/103) samples contained detectable levels of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;R. salmoninarum&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt; cells. Among the positive fish, the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;R. salmoninarum&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt; concentrations ranged from 25 cells/ml to 4.3 × 10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;9&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;cells/ml. A soluble antigenic fraction of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;R. salmoninarum&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt; was detected in 39% of the fish (40/103) by the ELISA. The ELISA is considered one of the most sensitive detection methods for bacterial kidney disease in tissues, yet it did not detect &lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;R. salmoninarum&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt; antigen consistently at bacterial cell concentrations below about 1.3 × 10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;cells/ml according to the MF-FAT counts. When total DNA was extracted and tested in a nested PCR designed to amplify a 320-base-pair region of the gene encoding a soluble 57-kD protein of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;R. salmoninarum&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;, 100% of the 100 samples tested were positive. The results provided strong evidence that &lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;R. salmoninarum&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt; may be present in ovarian fluids thought to be free of the bacterium on the basis of standard diagnostic methods.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1177/104063879801000111</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Comparison of the membrane-filtration fluorescent antibody test, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and the polymerase chain reaction to detect &lt;i&gt;Renibacterium salmoninarum&lt;/i&gt; in salmon ovarian fluid</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>