<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Dennis G. Dye</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jason M. Stoker</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>John M. Vogel</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Miguel G. Velasco</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Barry R. Middleton</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Zhuoting Wu</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) was recently established to provide airborne lidar data coverage on a national scale. As part of a broader research effort of the USGS to develop an effective remote sensing-based methodology for the creation of an operational biomass Essential Climate Variable (Biomass ECV) data product, we evaluated the performance of airborne lidar data at various pulse densities against Landsat 8 satellite imagery in estimating above ground biomass for forests and woodlands in a study area in east-central Arizona, U.S. High point density airborne lidar data, were randomly sampled to produce five lidar datasets with reduced densities ranging from 0.5 to 8 point(s)/m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;, corresponding to the point density range of 3DEP to provide national lidar coverage over time. Lidar-derived aboveground biomass estimate errors showed an overall decreasing trend as lidar point density increased from 0.5 to 8 points/m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;. Landsat 8-based aboveground biomass estimates produced errors larger than the lowest lidar point density of 0.5 point/m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;, and therefore Landsat 8 observations alone were ineffective relative to airborne lidar for generating a Biomass ECV product, at least for the forest and woodland vegetation types of the Southwestern U.S. While a national Biomass ECV product with optimal accuracy could potentially be achieved with 3DEP data at 8 points/m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;, our results indicate that even lower density lidar data could be sufficient to provide a national Biomass ECV product with accuracies significantly higher than that from Landsat observations alone.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Cloud Publications</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Evaluating lidar point densities for effective estimation of aboveground biomass</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>