<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Richard R. Knight</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Bonnie M. Blanchard</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1995</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Relocating grizzly bears (&lt;i&gt;Ursus arctos&lt;/i&gt;) from human/bear conflict situations has been a standard management procedure. Using data from Yellowstone National Park, we present components of situations that may affect the outcome of a relocation. Survival rates of transported bears were lower (&lt;i&gt;l&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; = 0.83) (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.001) than those not transported (&lt;i&gt;l&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; = 0.89). Survival was largely affected by whether the bear returned to the capture site (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.029). Return rate was most affected by distance transported (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.012) and age-sex group (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.014). Return rates decreased at distances -75 km, and subadult females returned least (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.050) often. Because of low survival and high return rates, transporting grizzly bears should be considered a final action to eliminate a conflict situation. However, transporting females must be considered a viable management technique because transports of some individuals have resulted in contributions to the population through successful reproduction.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.2307/3802463</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Wildlife Society</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Biological consequences of relocating grizzly bears in the Yellowstone ecosystem</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>