<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Clint C. Muhlfeld</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Robert K. Al-Chokhachy</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jason B. Dunham</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Benjamin Letcher</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jeffrey L. Kershner</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Ryan Kovach</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Despite increasing concern that climate change may negatively impact trout&amp;mdash;a globally distributed group of fish with major economic, ecological, and cultural value&amp;mdash;a synthetic assessment of empirical data quantifying relationships between climatic variation and trout ecology does not exist. We conducted a systematic review to describe how temporal variation in temperature and streamflow influences trout ecology in freshwater ecosystems. Few studies (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i class="EmphasisTypeItalic "&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;=&amp;nbsp;42) have quantified relationships between temperature or streamflow and trout demography, growth, or phenology, and nearly all estimates (96&amp;nbsp;%) were for&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i class="EmphasisTypeItalic "&gt;Salvelinus fontinalis&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i class="EmphasisTypeItalic "&gt;Salmo trutta&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;. Only seven studies used temporal data to quantify climate-driven changes in trout ecology. Results from these studies were beset with limitations that prohibited quantitatively rigorous meta-analysis, a concerning inadequacy given major investment in trout conservation and management worldwide. Nevertheless, consistent patterns emerged from our synthesis, particularly a positive effect of summer streamflow on trout demography and growth; 64&amp;nbsp;% of estimates were positive and significant across studies, age classes, species, and locations, highlighting that climate-induced changes in hydrology may have numerous consequences for trout. To a lesser degree, summer and fall temperatures were negatively related to population demography (51 and 53&amp;nbsp;% of estimates, respectively), but temperature was rarely related to growth. To address limitations and uncertainties, we recommend: (1) systematically improving data collection, description, and sharing; (2) appropriately integrating climate impacts with other intrinsic and extrinsic drivers over the entire lifecycle; (3) describing indirect consequences of climate change; and (4) acknowledging and describing intrinsic resiliency.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1007/s11160-015-9414-x</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Chapman &amp; Hall</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Impacts of climatic variation on trout: A global synthesis and path forward</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>