<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Daniel A. Isermann</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jonathan F. Hansen</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Kyle Mosel</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2015</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Harvest regulations for Black Crappie&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Pomoxis nigromaculatus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;and Yellow Perch&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Perca flavescens&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;in the northern USA and Canada have not been thoroughly evaluated, and specific guidance regarding where minimum length limits (MLLs) might improve these fisheries is lacking. We examined whether: (1) transitioning from an aggregate statewide daily creel limit of 25 panfish to species-specific daily creel limits of &amp;lt;25 fish or implementing statewide MLLs could reduce harvest of Black Crappie and Yellow Perch in Wisconsin by &amp;ge;25%, and (2) MLLs would improve yield by &amp;ge;10% and mean TL of harvested fish by &amp;ge;25&amp;nbsp;mm in Wisconsin fisheries. Creel surveys indicated that &amp;ge;94% of Wisconsin anglers did not harvest a Black Crappie or Yellow Perch, and &amp;le;0.12% of anglers harvested a daily creel limit of 25 fish. Daily creel limits would need to be &amp;le;7 fish/ angler to reduce harvest by &amp;ge;25%. Statewide MLLs would need to be &amp;ge;229&amp;nbsp;mm for Black Crappie and &amp;ge;203&amp;nbsp;mm for Yellow Perch to reduce harvest by &amp;ge;25%, but predicted responses to MLLs varied among simulated populations. In general, MLLs were not predicted to improve yield, indicating that growth overfishing was not a widespread problem. Minimum length limits could improve mean TL of harvested fish, but increases &amp;ge;25&amp;nbsp;mm were only observed under 254-mm and 279-mm MLLs, and anglers would have to accept predicted reductions in harvest of &amp;ge;30% to achieve these improvements. A 229-mm MLL offered a more equitable trade-off between increases in mean TLs of harvested fish (11&amp;ndash;21-mm improvements) and reductions in harvest (22&amp;ndash;37% reductions). Our modeling provides a framework for managers to make more informed decisions regarding harvest regulations, but more information regarding angler preferences is needed for selecting appropriate management objectives and harvest regulations.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1080/02755947.2014.963752</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Online</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Evaluation of daily creel and minimum length limits for Black Crappies and Yellow Perch in Wisconsin</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>