<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Megan A. Lionberger</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Bruce E. Jaffe</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Neil K. Ganju</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Scott Wright</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Gregory Shellenbarger</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>David H. Schoellhamer</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2005</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Comparison of a budget developed for 1955-1990 with a budget developed for 1995- 2002 showed decreasing sediment inflow and increased amounts leaving the Bay to upland disposal and sand mining, resulting in an increased rate of erosion of sediment from the Bay floor&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Finding a way to shift disposal from the Ocean back to the Bay could provide sediment for restoration projects and decrease dredging costs&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Increased erosion of the Bay is mobilizing legacy contaminants from the sediment bed&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Restoration projects could increase erosion and mobilization of legacy contaminants&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Sand mining, ignored in previous budgets, removes almost twice as much sediment from the Bay as dredging&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>San Francisco Estuary Institute</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Bay sediment budget: Sediment accounting 101</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>