<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Geoffrey S. Ellis</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Ward Said Ahmad</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Andrei Deev</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Alex L. Sessions</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Yongchun Tang</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jess F. Adkins</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jinzhong Liu</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>William P. Gilhooly III</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Zeev Aizenshtat</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Alon Amrani</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Alexander Meshoulam</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p id="sp0005"&gt;The sulfur isotopic fractionation associated with the formation of organic sulfur compounds (OSCs) during thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) was studied using gold-tube pyrolysis experiments to simulate TSR. The reactants used included&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;-hexadecane (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;-C&lt;sub&gt;16&lt;/sub&gt;) as a model organic compound with sulfate, sulfite, or elemental sulfur as the sulfur source. At the end of each experiment, the S-isotopic composition and concentration of remaining sulfate, H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;S, benzothiophene, dibenzothiophene, and 2-phenylthiophene (PT) were measured. The observed S-isotopic fractionations between sulfate and BT, DBT, and H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;S in experimental simulations of TSR correlate well with a multi-stage model of the overall TSR process. Large kinetic isotope fractionations occur during the first, uncatalyzed stage of TSR, 12.4&amp;permil; for H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;S and as much as 22.2&amp;permil; for BT. The fractionations decrease as the H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;S concentration increases and the reaction enters the second, catalyzed stage. Once all of the oxidizable hydrocarbons have been consumed, sulfate reduction ceases and equilibrium partitioning then dictates the fractionation between H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;S and sulfate (&amp;sim;17&amp;permil;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p id="sp0010"&gt;Experiments involving sparingly soluble CaSO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&amp;nbsp;show that during the second catalytic phase of TSR the rate of sulfate reduction exceeds that of sulfate dissolution. In this case, there is no apparent isotopic fractionation between source sulfate and generated H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;S, as all of the available sulfate is effectively reduced at all reaction times. When CaSO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&amp;nbsp;is replaced with fully soluble Na&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;SO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;, sulfate dissolution is no longer rate limiting and significant S-isotopic fractionation is observed. This supports the notion that CaSO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;dissolution can lead to the apparent lack of fractionation between H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;S and sulfate produced by TSR in nature. The S-isotopic composition of individual OSCs record information related to geochemical reactions that cannot be discerned from the &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;34&lt;/sup&gt;S values obtained from bulk phases such as H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;S, oil, and sulfate minerals, and provide important mechanistic details about the overall TSR process.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.gca.2016.05.026</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Study of thermochemical sulfate reduction mechanism using compound specific sulfur isotope analysis</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>