<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>L. David Mech</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Wesley E. Newton</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Bridget Borg</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Shannon M. Barber-Meyer</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2016</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div class="clear contain articlemetadata"&gt;
&lt;p class="description"&gt;Risk to predators hunting dangerous prey is an emerging area of research and could account for possible persistent differences in gray wolf (&lt;i&gt;Canis lupus&lt;/i&gt;) pack sizes. We documented significant differences in long-term wolf-pack-size averages and variation in the Superior National Forest (SNF), Denali National Park and Preserve, Yellowstone National Park, and Yukon, Canada (p&amp;lt;0.01). The SNF differences could be related to the wolves&amp;rsquo; risk when hunting primary prey, for those packs (N=3) hunting moose (&lt;i&gt;Alces americanus&lt;/i&gt;) were significantly larger than those (N=10) hunting white-tailed deer (&lt;i&gt;Odocoileus virginianus&lt;/i&gt;) (F1,8=16.50, p=0.004). Our data support the hypothesis that differential pack-size persistence may be perpetuated by differences in primary prey riskiness to wolves, and we highlight two important extensions of this idea: (1)&amp;nbsp;the potential for wolves to provision and defend injured packmates from other wolves and (2) the importance of less-risky, buffer prey to pack-size persistence and year-to-year variation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p class="articleAffiliations"&gt;Risk to predators hunting dangerous prey is an emerging area of research and could account for possible persistent differences in gray wolf (&lt;i&gt;Canis lupus&lt;/i&gt;) pack sizes. We documented significant differences in long-term wolf-pack-size averages and variation in the Superior National Forest (SNF), Denali National Park and Preserve, Yellowstone National Park, and Yukon, Canada (p&amp;lt;0.01). The SNF differences could be related to the wolves&amp;rsquo; risk when hunting primary prey, for those packs (N=3) hunting moose (&lt;i&gt;Alces americanus&lt;/i&gt;) were significantly larger than those (N=10) hunting white-tailed deer (&lt;i&gt;Odocoileus virginianus&lt;/i&gt;) (F1,8=16.50, p=0.004). Our data support the hypothesis that differential pack-size persistence may be perpetuated by differences in primary prey riskiness to wolves, and we highlight two important extensions of this idea: (1)&amp;nbsp;the potential for wolves to provision and defend injured packmates from other wolves and (2) the importance of less-risky, buffer prey to pack-size persistence and year-to-year variation.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1163/1568539X-00003391</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>E.J. Brill</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Differential wolf-pack-size persistence and the role of risk when hunting dangerous prey</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>