Matthew P. Miller Brian Pellerin Paul D. Capel Douglas A. Burns 2016 <p><span>The Potomac River is a large source of N to Chesapeake Bay, where reducing nutrient loads is a focus of efforts to improve trophic status. Better understanding of NO</span>₃^–<span> loss, reflected in part by diel variation in NO</span>₃^–<span> concentrations, may refine model predictions of N loads to the Bay. We analyzed 2 y of high-frequency NO</span>₃^–<span> sensor data in the Potomac to quantify seasonal variation in the magnitude and timing of diel NO</span>₃^–<span> loss. Diel patterns were evident, especially during low flow, despite broad seasonal and flow-driven variation in NO</span>₃^–<span> concentrations. Diel variation was ~0.01 mg N/L in winter and 0.02 to 0.03 mg N/L in summer with intermediate values in spring and autumn, equivalent to &lt;1% of the daily mean NO</span>₃^–<span> concentration in winter and ~2 to 4% in summer. Maximum diel NO</span>₃^–<span> values generally occurred in mid- to late morning, with more repeatable patterns in summer and wider variation in autumn and winter. Diel NO</span>₃^–<span> loss reduced loads by 0.7% in winter and 3% in summer. These losses were less than estimates of total in-stream NO</span>₃^–<span> load loss across the basin that averaged 33% of the annual groundwater contribution to the river. Water temperature and discharge had stronger relationships to the daily magnitude of diel NO</span>₃^–<span> variation than did photosynthetically active radiation. Estimated diel areal NO</span>₃^–<span> loss rates were generally &gt;1000 mg N m</span>^–2<span> d</span>^–1<span>, greater than most published values because measurements in this large river integrate over a greater depth/unit stream bottom area than do those from smaller rivers. These diel NO</span>₃^–<span> patterns are consistent with the influence of photoautotrophic uptake and related denitrification, but we cannot attribute these patterns to assimilation alone because the magnitude and timing of diel dynamics were affected to an unknown extent by processes, such as evapotranspiration, transient storage, and hydrodynamic dispersion. Improvements to diel loss estimates will require additional high-frequency measures, such as dissolved O</span>₂<span>, dissolved organic N, and NH</span>₄⁺<span>, and deployment of 2 measurement stations.</span></p> application/pdf 10.1086/688777 en The University of Chicago Press Patterns of diel variation in nitrate concentrations in the Potomac River article