<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Christine E. Turner</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Herman A. Karl</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2003</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Alan Leshner's Editorial “Public engagement with science” (14 Feb., p. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://science.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.299.5609.977" data-mce-href="http://science.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.299.5609.977"&gt;977&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;) highlights a conundrum: Why is science often ignored in important societal decisions, even as the call for decisions based on sound science escalates? One reason is that decision-making is often driven by a variety of nonscientific, adversarial, and stakeholder dynamics&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1126/science.300.5624.1370c</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Association for the Advancement of Science</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Incorporating Science into Decision-Making</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>