<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Imma Ferrer</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>R. Parry</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>E.M. Thurman</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2002</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Degradates of&amp;nbsp;acetochlor&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;alachlor&amp;nbsp;(ethanesulfonic acids, ESAs) were analyzed in both standards and in a groundwater sample using high-performance liquid chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry with&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;electrospray&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;ionization. The negative pseudomolecular ion of the&amp;nbsp;secondary amide&amp;nbsp;of acetochlor ESA and alachlor ESA gave average masses of 256.0750±0.0049 amu and 270.0786±0.0064 amu respectively. Acetochlor and alachlor ESA gave similar masses of 314.1098±0.0061 amu and 314.1153±0.0048 amu; however, they could not be distinguished by accurate mass because they have the same empirical formula. On the other hand, they may be distinguished using positive-ion electrospray because of different fragmentation spectra, which did not occur using negative-ion electrospray.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/S0021-9673(01)01470-4</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Accurate mass analysis of ethanesulfonic acid degradates of acetochlor and alachlor using high-performance liquid chromatography and time-of-flight mass spectrometry</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>