<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>W. E. Sanford</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Leonard F. Konikow</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1998</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div class="t m0 x2 h4 y4 ff1 fs3 fc0 sc0 ls0 ws0"&gt;&lt;p&gt;We appreciate the opportunity to continue a dialogue on&amp;nbsp;solute-transport modeling issues and perhaps to clarify some of&amp;nbsp;our original concerns. It appears to us that Holzbecher [this&amp;nbsp;issue] fails to consider the physical implications of groundwater&amp;nbsp;flow and solute transport along no-flow boundaries. A no-flow&amp;nbsp;boundary coincides with a streamline along which the fluid&amp;nbsp;velocity is generally nonzero. Because the velocity is nonzero,&amp;nbsp;both advective and dispersive transport processes can be operative along a no-flow boundary.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1029/98WR02189</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Geophysical Union</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Reply to comment by E. Holzbecher on "Constant-concentration boundary condition: Lessons from the HYDROCOIN variable-density groundwater benchmark problem"</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>