<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Thomas L. Delworth</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Moetasim Ashfaq</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Sergey Malyshev</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Paul C.D. Milly</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Sarah B. Kapnick</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The high mountains of Asia, including the Karakoram, Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau, combine to form a region of perplexing hydroclimate changes. Glaciers have exhibited mass stability or even expansion in the Karakoram region&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;a id="ref-link-1" title="Bolch, T. et al. The state and fate of Himalayan glaciers. Science 366, 310-314 (2012)." href="http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v7/n11/full/ngeo2269.html#ref1" data-mce-href="http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v7/n11/full/ngeo2269.html#ref1"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a id="ref-link-2" title="Hewitt, K. The Karakoram anomaly? Glacier expansion and the /`elevation effect,/' Karakoram Himalaya. Mt. Res. Dev. 25, 332-340 (2005)." href="http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v7/n11/full/ngeo2269.html#ref2" data-mce-href="http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v7/n11/full/ngeo2269.html#ref2"&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a id="ref-link-3" title="Gardelle, J., Berthier, E. &amp;amp; Arnaud, Y. Slight mass gain of Karakoram glaciers in the early twenty-first century. Nature Geosci. 5, 322-325 (2012)." href="http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v7/n11/full/ngeo2269.html#ref3" data-mce-href="http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v7/n11/full/ngeo2269.html#ref3"&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;, contrasting with glacial mass loss across the nearby Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;a id="ref-link-4" title="Bolch, T. et al. The state and fate of Himalayan glaciers. Science 366, 310-314 (2012)." href="http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v7/n11/full/ngeo2269.html#ref1" data-mce-href="http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v7/n11/full/ngeo2269.html#ref1"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a id="ref-link-5" title="Kang, S. et al. Review of climate and cryospheric change in the Tibetan Plateau. Environ. Res. Lett. 5, 015101 (2010)." href="http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v7/n11/full/ngeo2269.html#ref4" data-mce-href="http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v7/n11/full/ngeo2269.html#ref4"&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;, a pattern that has been termed the Karakoram anomaly. However, the remote location, complex terrain and multi-country fabric of high-mountain Asia have made it difficult to maintain longer-term monitoring systems of the meteorological components that may have influenced glacial change. Here we compare a set of high-resolution climate model simulations from 1861 to 2100 with the latest available observations to focus on the distinct seasonal cycles and resulting climate change signatures of Asia’s high-mountain ranges. We find that the Karakoram seasonal cycle is dominated by non-monsoonal winter precipitation, which uniquely protects it from reductions in annual snowfall under climate warming over the twenty-first century. The simulations show that climate change signals are detectable only with long and continuous records, and at specific elevations. Our findings suggest a meteorological mechanism for regional differences in the glacier response to climate&amp;nbsp;warming.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1038/ngeo2269</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Nature</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Snowfall less sensitive to warming in Karakoram than in Himalayas due to a unique seasonal cycle</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>