<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Julio L. Betancourt</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Malin Falkenmark</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Robert M. Hirsch</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Dennis P. Lettenmaier</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Ronald J. Stouffer</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Michael D. Dettinger</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Valentina Krysanova</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Paul C.D. Milly</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2015</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;We review and comment upon some themes in the recent stream of critical commentary on the assertion that “stationarity is dead,” attempting to clear up some misunderstandings; to note points of agreement; to elaborate on matters in dispute; and to share further relevant thoughts.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1002/2015WR017408</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Geophysical Union</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>On critiques of “Stationarity is dead: Whither water management?”</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>