<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Vincent A. Mudrak</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Carlos Echevarria</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Philip Sibrell</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Steven T. Summerfelt</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Claude E. Boyd</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Barnaby J. Watten</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Springs serving the Warm Springs Regional Fisheries Center, Warm Springs, Georgia, have pH, alkalinity, and hardness levels thatlie under the range required for successful fish propagation while free CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; is well above allowable targets. We evaluate a pretreatment process that exploits limestone’s (CaCO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;) ability to react away hydrogen ions (H&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;) and carbon dioxide (CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;) while increasing alkalinity (HCO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt;) and calcium (Ca2+) concentrations, i.e.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; CaCO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; + H&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; ↔ HCO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−&lt;/sup&gt; + Ca&lt;sup&gt;2+&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; CaCO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; + CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; + H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O ↔ Ca&lt;sup&gt;2+&lt;/sup&gt; + 2HCO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup&gt;− &lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Limestone sand was tested in both pilot and full scale fluidized bed reactors (CycloBio®). We first established the bed expansion characteristics of three commercial limestone products then evaluated the effect of hydraulic flux and bed height on dissolution rate of a single selected product (Type A16 × 120). Pilot scale testing at 18C showed limestone dissolution rates were relatively insensitive to flux over the range 1.51–3.03 m&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;/min/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; but were sensitive (P &amp;lt; 0.001; R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.881) to changes in bed height (BH, cm) over the range 83–165 cm following the relation: (Alkalinity, mg/L) = 123.51 − (3788.76 (BH)). Differences between filtered and non-filtered alkalinity were small(P &amp;gt; 0.05) demonstrating that limestone was present in the reactor effluent primarily in the form of dissolved Ca(HCO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;)&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;. Effluent alkalinity exceeded our target level of 50 mg/L under most operating conditions evaluated with typical pilot scale values falling within the range of 90–100 mg/L despite influent concentrations of about 4 mg/L. Concurrently, CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; fell from an average of 50.6 mg/L to 8.3 mg/L (90%), providing for an increase in pH from 5.27 to a mean of 7.71. The ability of the test reactor to provide changes in water chemistry variables that exceeded required changes allowed for a dilution ratio of 0.6. Here, alkalinity still exceeded 50 mg/L, the CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; concentration remained well below our limit of 20 mg/L (15.4 mg/L) and the pH was near neutral (7.17). Applying the dilution ratio of 0.6 in a full scale treatment plant at the site reduced by 40% the volume of spring water that is directed through each of three parallel reactors that combined react away 49,000 kg of limestone/yr.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.aquaeng.2017.03.003</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Aquacultural Engineering Society</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Performance and application of a fluidized bed limestone reactor designed for control of alkalinity, hardness and pH at the Warm Springs Regional Fisheries Center</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>