<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Christine Lepine</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Philip Sibrell</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Chad J. Penn</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Steven T. Summerfelt</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Laura E. Christianson</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Pairing denitrifying woodchip bioreactors and phosphorus-sorbing filters provides a unique, engineered approach for dual nutrient removal from waters impaired with both nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). This column study aimed to test placement of two P-filter media (acid mine drainage treatment residuals and steel slag) relative to a denitrifying system to maximize N and P removal and minimize pollution swapping under varying flow conditions (i.e., woodchip column hydraulic retention times (HRTs) of 7.2, 18, and 51&amp;nbsp;h; P-filter HRTs of 7.6–59&amp;nbsp;min). Woodchip denitrification columns were placed either upstream or downstream of P-filters filled with either medium. The configuration with woodchip denitrifying systems placed upstream of the P-filters generally provided optimized dissolved P removal efficiencies and removal rates. The P-filters placed upstream of the woodchip columns exhibited better P removal than downstream-placed P-filters only under overly long (i.e., N-limited) retention times when highly reduced effluent exited the woodchip bioreactors. The paired configurations using mine drainage residuals provided significantly greater P removal than the steel slag P-filters (e.g., 25–133 versus 8.8–48&amp;nbsp;g&amp;nbsp;P removed m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt; filter media d&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;, respectively), but there were no significant differences in N removal between treatments (removal rates: 8.0–18&amp;nbsp;g&amp;nbsp;N removed m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt; woodchips d&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;; N removal efficiencies: 18–95% across all HRTs). The range of HRTs tested here resulted in various undesirable pollution swapping by-products from the denitrifying bioreactors: nitrite production when nitrate removal was not complete and sulfate reduction, chemical oxygen demand production and decreased pH during overly long retention times. The downstream P-filter placement provided a polishing step for removal of chemical oxygen demand and nitrite.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.026</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Denitrifying woodchip bioreactor and phosphorus filter pairing to minimize pollution swapping</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>