<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Luke C. Loken</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>William E. West</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Benjamin Crary</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Seth A. Spawn</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Nicholas Gubbins</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Stuart E. Jones</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Robert G. Striegl</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Emily H. Stanley</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>John T. Crawford</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Streams, rivers, and other freshwater features may be significant sources of CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;to the atmosphere. However, high spatial and temporal variabilities hinder our ability to understand the underlying processes of CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;production and delivery to streams and also challenge the use of scaling approaches across large areas. We studied a stream having high geomorphic variability to assess the underlying scale of CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;spatial variability and to examine whether the physical structure of a stream can explain the variation in surface CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;. A combination of high-resolution CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;mapping, a survey of groundwater CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;concentrations, quantitative analysis of methanogen DNA, and sediment CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;production potentials illustrates the spatial and geomorphic controls on CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;emissions to the atmosphere. We observed significant spatial clustering with high CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;concentrations in organic-rich stream reaches and lake transitions. These sites were also enriched in the methane-producing&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;mcrA&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;gene and had highest CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;production rates in the laboratory. In contrast, mineral-rich reaches had significantly lower concentrations and had lesser abundances of&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;mcrA&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;. Strong relationships between CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;and the physical structure of this aquatic system, along with high spatial variability, suggest that future investigations will benefit from viewing streams as landscapes, as opposed to ecosystems simply embedded in larger terrestrial mosaics. In light of such high spatial variability, we recommend that future workers evaluate stream networks first by using similar spatial tools in order to build effective sampling programs.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1002/2016JG003698</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Geophysical Union</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Spatial heterogeneity of within-stream methane concentrations</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>