<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>David Kinner</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Xavier Ubeda</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>John A. Moody</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2009</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Heat from wildfires can produce a two-layer system composed of extremely dry soil covered by a layer of ash, which when subjected to rainfall, may produce extreme floods. To understand the soil physics controlling runoff for these initial conditions, we used a small, portable disk infiltrometer to measure two hydraulic properties: (1) near-saturated hydraulic conductivity,&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;f&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;and (2) sorptivity,&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;S&lt;/i&gt;(&lt;i&gt;θ&lt;sub&gt;i&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;), as a function of initial soil moisture content,&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;θ&lt;sub&gt;i&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, ranging from extremely dry conditions (&lt;i&gt;θ&lt;sub&gt;i&lt;/sub&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/i&gt;&amp;lt;&amp;nbsp;0.02&amp;nbsp;cm&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&amp;nbsp;cm&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt;) to near saturation. In the field and in the laboratory replicate measurements were made of ash, reference soils, soils unaffected by fire, and fire-affected soils. Each has a different degrees of water repellency that influences&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;f&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;and&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;S&lt;/i&gt;(&lt;i&gt;θ&lt;sub&gt;i&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Values of&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;f&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;ranged from 4.5&amp;nbsp;×&amp;nbsp;10&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;to 53&amp;nbsp;×&amp;nbsp;10&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt;&amp;nbsp;cm&amp;nbsp;s&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;for ash; from 0.93&amp;nbsp;×&amp;nbsp;10&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;to 130&amp;nbsp;×&amp;nbsp;10&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt;&amp;nbsp;cm&amp;nbsp;s&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;for reference soils; and from 0.86&amp;nbsp;×&amp;nbsp;10&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;to 3.0&amp;nbsp;×&amp;nbsp;10&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt;&amp;nbsp;cm&amp;nbsp;s&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;, for soil unaffected by fire, which had the lowest values of&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;f&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;. Measurements indicated that&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;S&lt;/i&gt;(&lt;i&gt;θ&lt;sub&gt;i&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;) could be represented by an empirical non-linear function of&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;θ&lt;sub&gt;i&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;with a sorptivity maximum of 0.18–0.20&amp;nbsp;cm&amp;nbsp;s&lt;sup&gt;−0.5&lt;/sup&gt;, between 0.03 and 0.08&amp;nbsp;cm&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&amp;nbsp;cm&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt;. This functional form differs from the monotonically decreasing non-linear functions often used to represent&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;S&lt;/i&gt;(&lt;i&gt;θ&lt;sub&gt;i&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;) for rainfall–runoff modeling. The sorptivity maximum may represent the combined effects of gravity, capillarity, and adsorption in a transitional domain corresponding to extremely dry soil, and moreover, it may explain the observed non-linear behavior, and the critical soil-moisture threshold of water repellent soils. Laboratory measurements of&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;K&lt;sub&gt;f&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;and&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;S&lt;/i&gt;(&lt;i&gt;θ&lt;sub&gt;i&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;) are the first for ash and fire-affected soil, but additional measurements are needed of these hydraulic properties for in situ fire-affected soils. They provide insight into water repellency behavior and infiltration under extremely dry conditions. Most importantly, they indicate how existing rainfall–runoff models can be modified to accommodate a possible two-layer system in extremely dry conditions. These modified models can be used to predict floods from burned watersheds under these initial conditions.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.015</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Linking hydraulic properties of fire-affected soils to infiltration and water repellency</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>