<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Raphael Kudela</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>James Hagy</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Lawrence W. Harding Jr.</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>David Senn</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>James E. Cloern</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Suzanne B. Bricker</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Gry Mine Berg</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Marcus W. Beck</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Martha Sutula</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;San Francisco Bay (SFB), USA, is highly enriched in nitrogen and phosphorus, but has been resistant to the classic symptoms of eutrophication associated with over-production of&amp;nbsp;&lt;a title="Learn more about Phytoplankton" href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/phytoplankton" data-mce-href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/phytoplankton"&gt;phytoplankton&lt;/a&gt;. Observations in recent years suggest that this resistance may be weakening, shown by: significant increases of chlorophyll-&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;chl-a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;) and decreases of dissolved oxygen (DO), common occurrences of phytoplankton taxa that can form Harmful Algal Blooms (HAB), and algal toxins in water and mussels reaching levels of concern. As a result, managers now ask: what levels of&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;chl-a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;in SFB constitute tipping points of phytoplankton biomass beyond which water quality will become degraded, requiring significant nutrient reductions to avoid impairments? We analyzed data for DO, phytoplankton species composition,&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;chl-a,&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;and algal toxins to derive quantitative relationships between three indicators (HAB abundance, toxin concentrations, DO) and&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;chl-a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;. Quantile regressions relating HAB abundance and DO to&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;chl-a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;were significant, indicating SFB is at increased risk of adverse HAB and low DO levels if&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;chl-a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;continues to increase. Conditional probability analysis (CPA) showed&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;chl-a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;of 13&amp;nbsp;mg&amp;nbsp;m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;as a “protective” threshold below which probabilities for exceeding alert levels for HAB abundance and toxins were reduced. This threshold was similar to&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;chl-a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;of 13–16&amp;nbsp;mg&amp;nbsp;m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;that would meet a SFB-wide 80% saturation Water Quality Criterion (WQC) for DO. Higher “at risk”&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;chl-a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;thresholds from 25 to 40&amp;nbsp;mg&amp;nbsp;m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;corresponded to 0.5 probability of exceeding alert levels for HAB abundance, and for DO below a WQC of 5.0&amp;nbsp;mg&amp;nbsp;L&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;designated for lower South Bay (LSB) and South Bay (SB). We submit these thresholds as a basis to assess eutrophication status of SFB and to inform&lt;span&gt; nutrient management&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;actions. This approach is transferrable to other estuaries to derive&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;chl-a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;thresholds protective against eutrophication.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.ecss.2017.07.009</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Novel analyses of long-term data provide a scientific basis for chlorophyll-a thresholds in San Francisco Bay</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>