<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Craig D. Snyder</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Erin Snook</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Zachary Johnson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Matthew Morgan</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Nathaniel P. Hitt</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Anticipating and mitigating the effects of climate change is a fundamental challenge for&amp;nbsp;natural resource conservation. In this report, we respond to research needs identified by Catoctin&amp;nbsp;Mountain Park (CATO) for native Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) conservation and&amp;nbsp;management as part of the US Geological Survey (USGS) Natural Resources Preservation&amp;nbsp;Program in FY15-16. We addressed three overarching research questions: (1) How will&amp;nbsp;anticipated changes in air temperature affect stream habitats? (2) How will changes to stream&amp;nbsp;habitat affect the distribution of Brook Trout? (3) Which stream segments are most and least&amp;nbsp;vulnerable to the effects of climate change?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;First, we surveyed Brook Trout abundance and fish community composition using&amp;nbsp;electrofishing techniques within three watersheds: Owens Creek, upper Big Hunting Creek, and&amp;nbsp;Blue Blazes Creek (a tributary to Big Hunting Creek). Second, we deployed a network of stream&amp;nbsp;temperature gages to assess spatial variation in stream temperature and groundwater (GW)&amp;nbsp;influence. Third, we used modeling techniques to forecast future stream temperatures that account for GW influences and air temperature scenarios.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fish sampling detected 13 species and 15,345 individual fish, the majority of which were&amp;nbsp;Blacknose Dace (60%), Blue Ridge Sculpin (26%), and Brook Trout (6%). Brook Trout were not&amp;nbsp;observed in Blue Blazes Creek and exhibited higher densities in Owens Creek than upper Big&amp;nbsp;Hunting Creek (average densities = 19 fish/100 m and 4 fish/100 m, respectively). In&amp;nbsp; contrast,&amp;nbsp;Brown Trout were present in Blue Blazes Creek and exhibited greater density in Blue Blazes&amp;nbsp;Creek than either Owens Creek or upper Big Hunting Creek (average densities = 3.0 fish/100 m,&lt;br&gt;0.3 fish/100 m, and 1.7 fish/100 m, respectively). Brown Trout occurred in sympatry with Brook&amp;nbsp;Trout in Owens Creek and upper Big Hunting Creek, but appeared to have replaced Brook Trout&lt;br&gt;in Blue Blazes Creek. Our fish surveys also revealed important locations for Brook Trout&amp;nbsp;reproduction and young-of-year (YOY) dispersal within the Owens Creek watershed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our study also revealed surprising differences in the distribution of Blue Ridge Sculpin&amp;nbsp;among CATO streams. This species was abundant in Owens Creek (average density = 83&amp;nbsp;fish/100 m) but was less common in Blue Blazes Creek (average density = 12 fish/100 m) and&amp;nbsp;was not detected in upper Big Hunting Creek. Histological examination of several specimens&amp;nbsp;from Blue Blazes Creek by V. Blazer at the USGS Leetown Science Center revealed the&amp;nbsp;presence of a novel parasite (Dermosystidium sp.) which has been linked to fish population&amp;nbsp;declines elsewhere (Blazer et al. 2016). The parasite was not detected in Blue Ridge Sculpin&amp;nbsp;samples from Owens Creek, and all trout appeared to be uninfected. Our survey results suggest&amp;nbsp;that Blue Ridge Sculpin have been extirpated from upper Big Hunting Creek and have not&amp;nbsp;recolonized from downstream source populations due to the fish passage barrier of Cunningham&amp;nbsp;Falls. We recommend additional research to (1) evaluate the feasibility of&amp;nbsp; reintroducing Blue&amp;nbsp;Ridge Sculpin into upper Big Hunting Creek and (2) continue monitoring the distribution and&amp;nbsp;potential spread of Dermocystidium in downstream waters.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stream temperatures ranged from 9.6 – 27.6 ºC during baseflow conditions in 2015 and&amp;nbsp;2016. Sites within upper Big Hunting Creek were consistently warmer than in Owens Creek or&amp;nbsp;Blue Blazes Creek, suggesting an effect of headwater ponds outside CATO on upper Big&amp;nbsp;Hunting Creek temperatures. For instance, in 2016 the maximum observed temperature in upper&amp;nbsp;Big Hunting Creek was 27.6 ºC whereas Owens Creek reached a maximum of 23.7 ºC that year.&amp;nbsp;Stream temperature data also revealed that 2016 was warmer than 2015 throughout the study&amp;nbsp;area but did not exceed thermal tolerance limits for Brook Trout in either year.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We estimated the influence of GW on stream temperatures using a statistical modeling approach based on the relationship between daily mean air temperature and stream temperature&amp;nbsp;over time. Results indicated that effects of GW were generally stronger in the Owens Creek&amp;nbsp;watershed than in Blue Blazes or upper Big Hunting Creek. However, we detected substantial&amp;nbsp;spatial variation in GW influence among Owens Creek sites, with stream temperatures at some&amp;nbsp;locations showing relatively little GW influence and others showing very strong influences (and&amp;nbsp;correspondingly small influence of daily mean air temperatures). Although incoming lateral&amp;nbsp;seeps were detected in upper Big Hunting Creek (D. Ferrier, Hood College, personal&amp;nbsp;communication), the strongest effects of GW in the study area were due to GW upwelling within&amp;nbsp;portions of the Owens Creek watershed (i.e., Tributary C in Figure 4) where we also observed&amp;nbsp;high numbers of Brook Trout juveniles. Our results therefore identified potential high-priority&amp;nbsp;areas for Brook Trout conservation in CATO.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Finally, we modeled future stream temperatures based on scenarios characterizing GW&amp;nbsp;sensitivity to air temperature and future air temperature increases. Stream temperature forecasts&amp;nbsp;revealed important differences in habitat suitability for Brook Trout within and among&amp;nbsp;watersheds. Big Hunting Creek sites were generally more sensitive to air temperature increases&amp;nbsp;than sites in Owens Creek or Blue Blazes Creek. For instance, an increase in mean annual air&amp;nbsp;temperature of 1.5 ºC (lowest level evaluated) exceeded thermal thresholds for Brook Trout in&amp;nbsp;the majority of sites within that watershed, regardless of GW influence levels. In contrast, an air&amp;nbsp;temperature increase of 1.5 ºC did not exceed thermal thresholds for Brook Trout in Owens&amp;nbsp;Creek. However, modeled air temperature increases of 5 ºC resulted in a loss of Brook Trout&amp;nbsp;thermal suitability throughout the study area. Model results revealed spatially patchy responses to air temperature increases that could provide an early-warning system for trout monitoring&lt;br&gt;designs in CATO.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:title>Forecasting stream habitat and Brook Trout responses to climate change in Catoctin Mountain Park</dc:title>
  <dc:type>reports</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>