<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Daniel A. Isermann</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Greg G. Sass</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Daniel J. Dembkowski</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2018</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The ability to individually mark juvenile fishes has important implications for fisheries management. For example, marking age-0 Walleye Sander vitreus could provide important information not provided by batch-marking, including individual variation in growth and estimates of length-dependent survival and recruitment. However, the relatively small size of age-0 Walleye in north temperate lakes has precluded use of many common tagging methods that provide information on individual fish (e.g., various anchor tags, jaw tags). Consequently, we evaluated short-term mortality and retention associated with using 12-mm passive integrated transponders (PITs) to mark age-0 Walleye (TL range = 93-216 mm; mean TL = 157 mm) by conducting 48-h within-lake net-pen trials and 7-d hatchery trials during September-October of 2015 and 2016. Age-0 Walleye were not anesthetized prior to PIT tagging. Our assessment allowed us to determine whether post-tagging mortality and PIT retention varied in relation to implant location (i.e., body cavity or pelvic girdle), fish length, and water temperature. During 2015, mean 48-h mortality rate of age-0 Walleye tagged with PITs in the body cavity was low (7%; SE = 3%) and did not differ from that of fish marked with only a fin clip (4%; SE = 2%) and reference fish (2%; SE = 1%). During 2016, mean mortality rates ranged from 2% (reference fish) to 6% (PIT inserted into pelvic girdle) and did not differ among treatments. During both years, mortality rates for nearly all treatments were highest (&amp;amp;gt; 13%) when water temperatures were {greater than or equal to} 20°C, but decreased below 5% when water temperatures were {less than or equal to} 17°C. During 2016, dead age-0 Walleye in both PIT treatments were smaller than fish that survived. During the 7-d hatchery trials, mean mortality rates were higher for age-0 Walleye with PITs inserted into the body cavity (13%; SE = 4%) than fish that received a PIT in the pelvic girdle (4%; SE = 1%) and reference fish (4%; SE = 2%). Retention of PITs was high (&amp;amp;gt; 96%) during all net-pen and hatchery trials. Collectively, our results suggest that PITs can be used to tag age-0 Walleye without anesthesia with the expectations of high initial retention and low mortality. Mortality rates may be minimized by implanting PITs into the pelvic girdle when water temperatures are {less than or equal to} 17°C.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3996/102017-JFWM-081</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Short-term mortality and retention associated with tagging Age-0 walleye using passive integrated transponders (PITs) in the absence of anesthesia</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>