<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Vance C. Kennedy</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>S. Marc Zand</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Ronald J. Avanzino</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Gary W. Zellweger</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Michael J. Sebetich</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>1984</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Injections of NO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;and PO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;were made during September 1975 into Little Lost Man Creek, a small pristine stream in Redwood National Park, California. Chloride, a conservative constituent, was added in a known ratio to the nutrients. Nutrient loss at a downstream point was calculated using concentration of added Cl as a reference. Nitrate nitrogen (NO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;‐N), added for 4 h, reached 920 μg/1 (above 5 μg/1 background) just below the injection point, but increased only to 405 μg/1 at 310 m downstream. The concentration decrease was attributed to dispersion and to uptake by stream biota. Percent of NO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;‐N lost decreased with increasing concentration of NO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;‐N. Phosphate phosphorus (PO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;‐P) was added a week after the NO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;‐N for 3 h, causing a concentration increase of 296 μg/1 (above 13 μg/1 background) just below the injection point, of 161 μg/1 at 90 m downstream, and of 98 μg/1 at 310 m. Percent loss of PO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;‐P at downstream sites increased with increasing PO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;‐P concentration and also for a short period after peak concentration occurred, but then decreased as PO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;‐P concentration continued decreasing. Differences in stream response to added NO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;‐N and PO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;‐P are attributed to differing rates of reaction with biota and differing degrees of interaction with abiotic stream solids.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1111/j.1752-1688.1984.tb04646.x</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>American Water Resources Association</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Dynamics of added nitrate and phosphate compared in a northern California woodland stream </dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>