<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Matthew J. Johnson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Dan W. Bean</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Charles van Riper III</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Levi R. Jamison</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2018</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Timing and spatial dynamics of tamarisk (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Tamarix&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;spp. L.) defoliation by the biological control agent&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Diorhabda carinulata&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;(Desbrochers) were evaluated. Relative abundance of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D. carinulata&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;and the phenology of tamarisk along the San Juan and Colorado rivers were recorded in 2011–2012.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D. carinulata&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;began reproducing in the spring when temperatures were &amp;gt;15°C. Variation in spring temperature-rise affected the timing of development of larvae of the first summer generation and initial defoliation of tamarisk at each site. Shortening day lengths in mid- to late-summer cued&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D. carinulata&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;to enter reproductive diapause resulting in cessation of defoliation. The critical day length for inducing reproductive diapause was 33–47 minutes shorter than that of populations of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D. carinulata&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;released into North America in 2001. Variation in spring temperature-rise combined with timing of shortening day length resulted in differences in&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D. carinulata&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;voltinism per site. During the active season, larvae were less likely to establish in areas where defoliation was &amp;gt;70%. Lack of reestablishment of larvae led to temporary loss of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D. carinulata&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;from the locations and allowed tamarisks to sprout new canopies. Defoliation of tamarisk was dictated by environmental cues and abundance of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D. carinulata&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;, and in turn large amounts of defoliation negatively affected abundance of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;D. carinulata&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3958/059.043.0302</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Society of Southwestern Entomologists</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Phenology and abundance of Northern Tamarisk Beetle, Diorhabda carinulata affecting defoliation of Tamarix</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>