<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Jeffrey J. Love</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2007</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Our concern is with the statistical description of paleomagnetic vectors and the estimation of their mean and variance. These vectors may come from a number of different rock units or archeological samples, representing a range of acquisition times, and be useful for studies of the mean paleomagnetic field and&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i class="EmphasisTypeItalic "&gt;paleosecular variation&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;; alternatively, the vectors may come from individual measurements taken from a given rock unit or archeological sample, representing the same moment of acquisition, and be useful for studying the acquisition process itself. Directional data of a particular polarity are usually analyzed with a&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i class="EmphasisTypeItalic "&gt;Fisher distribution&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;(1953), and data of mixed polarities are usually analyzed with a&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i class="EmphasisTypeItalic "&gt;Bingham distribution&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;(1964). Occasionally, other directional distributions are used. For example, Bingham (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="CitationRef"&gt;1983&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;) considered the projection of a three‐dimensional (3D), scalar‐variance Gaussian distribution onto the unit sphere, something he called the “angular‐Gaussian” distribution. More recently, Khokhlov&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i class="EmphasisTypeItalic "&gt;et al.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="CitationRef"&gt;2001&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;) considered a generalization of the angular‐Gaussian distribution, one with a covariance matrix, which they used to analyze directional data from a number of sites. With respect to intensity data, they have traditionally been treated separately from paleodirections, analyzed with normal, log‐normal, or gamma distributions. Here, for data of either a particular polarity or of mixed polarities, we summarize these works, and that of Love and Constable (&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="CitationRef"&gt;2003&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;), who developed a full‐vector, scalar‐variance, Gaussian‐statistical framework for treating directional and intensity data simultaneously and self‐consistently.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1007/978-1-4020-4423-6_295</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Springer</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Statistical methods for paleovector analysis</dc:title>
  <dc:type>chapter</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>