<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Kim L Howland</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Les N. Harris</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Michael J. Hansen</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>C P Gallagher</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>W J Harford</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>W M Tonn</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Andrew M. Muir</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Charles C. Krueger</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Louise Chavarie</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;A range of organisms, from plankton to fish, commonly shift their habitat distributions horizontally or vertically due to predation risk. Juvenile lake trout,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Salvelinus namaycush&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;, are generally viewed as occupying deep areas of lakes to decrease predation pressure from adults. In contrast, we found that juvenile lake trout from Great Bear Lake, NT, Canada, occupied a variety of habitats and from shallow to deep depths (0–150&amp;nbsp;m), overlapping with adult lake trout. No evidence occurred for a length depth‐based segregation (e.g., ontogenetic shift). Genetic variation was also similar among juveniles in the different depth zones. However, isotopic niches and C:N ratios among juveniles showed some variability in niche widths and positions for individuals caught from the 51–150&amp;nbsp;m zone compared to juvenile individuals caught from 0–20&amp;nbsp;m and 21–50&amp;nbsp;m zones. The uniformly distributed adult lake trout in Great Bear Lake may evenly distribute predation pressure (including cannibalism) across shallow‐ and deep‐water habitats more than in other lakes. As a result, juveniles may respond to differences in foraging opportunities rather than predation risks. Juvenile lake trout did not appear to conform to the general pattern of juveniles seeking a deep‐water refuge to reduce predation risks. In contrast, juvenile lake trout of Great Bear Lake displayed broad resource use across all depths and habitats.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1111/eff.12470</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Wiley</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Habitat overlap of juvenile and adult lake trout of Great Bear Lake: Evidence for lack of a predation gradient?</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>