<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Matthew I. Staid</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>James A. Tyburczy</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>B. Ray Hawke</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Noah E. Petro</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Lisa R. Gaddis</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2003</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The 5-band Clementine UVVIS data at ∼100 m/pixel were used to examine the compositions of 75 large and small lunar&amp;nbsp;pyroclastic deposits&amp;nbsp;(LPDs), and these were compared to representative&amp;nbsp;lunar maria&amp;nbsp;and highlands deposits. Results show that the&amp;nbsp;albedo, spectral color, and inferred composition of most LPDs are similar to those of low-titanium, mature&amp;nbsp;lunar maria. These LPDs may have consisted largely of fragmented&amp;nbsp;basalt, with substantial components of iron-bearing mafic minerals (pyroxenes, olivine) and smaller amounts (if any) of&amp;nbsp;volcanic glass. Several smaller LPDs also show substantial highland components. Three classes of very large deposits can be distinguished from most LPDs and from each other on the basis of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;crystallinity&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;and possible titanium content of their pyroclastic components. One class has spectral properties that are dominated by high-titanium, crystallized “black beads” (e.g., Taurus–Littrow), a second consists of a mixture of high-titanium glasses and beads with a higher glass/bead ratio (Sulpicius Gallus) than that of Taurus–Littrow, and a third has a significant component of quenched iron-bearing volcanic glasses (Aristarchus) with possible moderate titanium contents. Although areally extensive, these three classes of very large pyroclastic deposits compose only 20 of the 75 deposits studied (∼27%), and eruption of such materials was thus likely to have been less frequent on the Moon.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/S0019-1035(02)00036-2</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Compositional analyses of lunar pyroclastic deposits</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>