<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Michael C. Runge</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>David A. Keith</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Brendan A. Wintle</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Sarah A. Bekessy</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Alex Kusmanoff</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Central to discussions about the merits of ecosystem services as a communication strategy is the degree to which it represents a strategic and effective approach to advance biodiversity conservation. There is increasing recognition that many conservation communication efforts can be more strategic (e.g. Kusmanoff et al. 2016).</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.biocon.2019.03.038</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Pathways to strategic communication for biodiversity conservation: Response to “Hearing ourselves (and acting in consequence): A commentary on Bekessy et al. from a bird-handling environmental education perspective”</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>