Hossein Jahediesfanjani
Steven T. Anderson
2019
<p><span>Deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) could be necessary to be able to satisfy baseload electricity demand, maintain diversity in the energy mix, and achieve mitigation of carbon dioxide (CO</span><sub>2</sub><span>) emissions at lowest cost (</span>IPCC, 2015<span>; </span>U.S. DOE, 2016<span>). If basin-, regional- or national-scale deployment of CCS is needed, it may be possible to store only a small fraction of the captured CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> in oil and natural gas reservoirs. The vast majority would likely have to be stored in saline formations. Pressure buildup as a result of injecting CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> into such reservoirs is expected to be an important source of risk associated with CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> storage, and could constrain dynamic storage capacities (maximum injection rates) to be far below estimates based on access to theoretical storage resources. Estimates of CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> storage costs based on an assumption of practical availability of the theoretical storage resource could lead to underestimation of the costs of CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> storage. In this study, simulation results suggest that the pressure-limited dynamic CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> storage capacity of the Mount Simon Sandstone could be less than 4% of the theoretical storage resource in this saline formation, and storage costs could be an order of magnitude higher than recent estimates. However, consideration of the geologic heterogeneity in this deep saline formation allowed definition of a high injectivity zone, and estimated costs of CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> storage in this “sweet spot” of the reservoir approached recent estimates that did not include costs for pressure management.</span></p>
application/pdf
10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.05.031
en
Elsevier Ltd.
Estimating the pressure-limited dynamic capacity and costs of basin-scale CO2 storage in a Saline Formation
article