<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Barbara A. Lubinski</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jacob M Rash</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Tim L. King</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>David C. Kazyak</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;We genotyped 7,588 brook trout representing 406 collections from across the State&amp;nbsp;of North Carolina (Figure 1) at 12 microsatellite loci (King et al. 2012). The vast majority of&lt;br&gt;collections appeared to represent single populations, based on general conformance to HardyWeinberg equilibrium and limited evidence for linkage-disequilibrium. Allelic diversity was low to&amp;nbsp;moderate relative to Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis populations endemic to higher latitudes.&amp;nbsp;Effective population sizes varied widely among populations, but were often very small and&amp;nbsp;indicate that many populations are at risk of losing diversity through genetic drift. Remarkable&amp;nbsp;levels of genetic differentiation exist among populations, which suggests that little, if any, gene&amp;nbsp;flow occurs among most populations. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed that&amp;nbsp;a substantial portion of the observed genetic variation was attributed to differences among&amp;nbsp;patches (44.8%), and there was some variation (11.2%) even among collections within a single&amp;nbsp;patch. These results, taken in conjunction with high levels of genetic differentiation among&amp;nbsp;populations, suggest that the fundamental unit of management for Brook Trout should be the&lt;br&gt;population. Interestingly, despite extensive stocking across the state, the vast majority of wild&amp;nbsp;populations show limited evidence of introgression by northern origin hatchery strains. These&amp;nbsp;results represent a valuable baseline for management and restoration efforts, and can be&amp;nbsp;used to (a) select suitable donor streams for translocation efforts, (b) identify streams with low&amp;nbsp;effective population sizes that may be vulnerable to extirpation, and (c) target stocking efforts&amp;nbsp;into watersheds where extensive introgression has already occurred. All data associated with this&amp;nbsp;manuscript has been publicly released (Kazyak et al. 2017).&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher> Wild Trout Symposium</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Understanding the genetic characteristics of Wild Brook Trout populations in North Carolina thanks to the guidance of Dr. Tim King</dc:title>
  <dc:type>text</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>