<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>George A. Platt</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Elliott P. Barnhart</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Randy Hiebart</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Robert Hyatt</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Matthew W. Fields</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Robin Gerlach</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Katherine J. Davis</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;ubsurface coal environments, where biogenic coal-to-methane conversion occurs, are difficult to access, resulting in inherent challenges and expenses for&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;in situ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;experiments. Previous batch reactor studies provided insights into specific processes, pathways, kinetics, and engineering strategies, but field-relevance is restricted due to limited substrate availability or byproduct accumulation that may influence reactions or metabolisms. In this study, continuous-flow column reactors were used to overcome some batch limitations, improve the understanding of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;in situ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;conditions, and increase field-relevance for subsurface engineering technology development. The bench-scale reactor system was constructed to investigate the addition of algal amendment for enhancing microbial coal-to-methane conversion previously developed in batch systems. Four reactor columns were packed with coal and inoculated with a microbial consortium from the same Flowers-Goodale coal bed. Two reactors were amended with&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;C-labeled algal amendment on day 0, and two were unamended. On day 61, one previously amended and one previously unamended reactor were re-amended. Produced gases were captured in a gas trap, and CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;and CO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;were quantified. The reactor amended twice produced 1712.6 µmol CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;(4.6% as&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;). The reactor amended only on day 0 produced 1485.5 µmol CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;(2.6% as&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;). The reactor amended only on day 61 produced 278.9 µmol CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;(3.9% as&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;CH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;). The reactor with no amendment produced no measurable gases for the duration of the 172-day experiment. Amendment increased the rate of coal-to-methane conversion and total gas production; most of the produced gases were due to coal conversion with only small contributions (&amp;lt;7%) from amendment conversion.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115905</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Biogenic coal-to-methane conversion can be enhanced with small additions of algal amendment in field-relevant upflow column reactors</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>