<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Matthias Schroter</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Kenneth J. Bagstad</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Christian Kuhlicke</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Thomas Kastner</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Dor Fridman</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Catharina J. E. Schulp</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Sarah Wolff</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Javier Martinez-Lopez</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Thomas Koellner</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Sebastian Arnhold</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Berta Martin-Lopez</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Alexandra Marques</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Laura Lopez-Hoffman</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jianguo Liu</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Meidad Kissinger</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Carlos Guerra</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Aletta Bonn</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Janina Kleeman</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2020</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Despite a growing number of national-scale ecosystem service (ES) assessments, few studies consider the impacts of ES use and consumption beyond national or regional boundaries. Interregional ES flows – ecosystem services “imported” from and “exported” to other countries – are rarely analyzed and their importance for global sustainability is little known. Here, we provide a first multi-ES quantification of a nation's use of ES from abroad. We focus on ES flows that benefit the population in Germany but are supplied outside German territory. We employ a conceptual framework recently developed to systematically quantify interregional ES flows. We address four types of interregional ES flows with: (i) biophysical flows of traded goods: cocoa import for consumption; (ii) flows mediated by migratory species: migration of birds providing pest control; (iii) passive biophysical flows: flood control along transboundary watersheds; and (iv) information flows: China's giant panda loan to the Berlin Zoo. We determined that: (i) Ivory Coast and Ghana alone supply around 53% of Germany's cocoa while major negative consequences for biodiversity occurred in Cameroon and Ecuador; (ii) Africa´s humid and sub-humid climate zones are important habitats for the majority of migratory bird species that provide natural pest control services in agricultural areas in Germany; (iii) Upstream watersheds outside the country add an additional 64% flood regulation services nationally, while Germany exports 40% of flood regulation services in neighboring, downstream countries; (iv) Information flows transported by the pandas were mainly related to political aspects and - contrary to our expectations - considerably less on biological and natural aspects. We discuss the implications of these results for international resource management policy and governance.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102051</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services – A case study for Germany</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>