<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Jaime A. Collazo</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>P.C. Stevenson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>R.E. Irwin</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>S.G. Prado</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div id="Abs1-section" class="c-article-section"&gt;&lt;div id="Abs1-content" class="c-article-section__content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Floral traits and rewards are important in mediating interactions between plants and pollinators. Agricultural management practices can affect abiotic factors known to influence floral traits; however, our understanding of the links between agricultural practices and floral trait expression is still poorly understood. Variation in floral morphological, nectar, and pollen traits of two important agricultural species,&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Coffea arabica&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;and&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;C. canephora&lt;/i&gt;, was assessed under different agricultural practices (sun and shade). Corolla diameter and corolla tube length were larger and pollen total nitrogen content greater in shade plantations of&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;C. canephora&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;than sun plantations. Corolla tube length and anther filament length were larger in shade plantations of&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;C. arabica&lt;/i&gt;. No effect of agricultural practice was found on nectar volume, sugar or caffeine concentrations, or pollen production. Pollen total nitrogen content was lower in sun than shade plantations of&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;C. canephora&lt;/i&gt;, but no difference was found between sun and shade for&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;C. arabica&lt;/i&gt;. This study provides baseline data on the influence of agronomic practices on&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;C. arabica&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;and&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;C. canephora&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;floral traits and also helps fill a gap in knowledge about the effects of shade trees on floral traits, which can be pertinent to other agroforestry systems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1038/s41598-019-43753-y</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Nature</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>A comparison of coffee floral traits under two different agricultural practices</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>