<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Melia G. Nafus</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Page Klug</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Bjorn Lardner</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>M.J. Mazurek</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Julie A. Savidge</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Robert Reed</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Amy A. Yackel Adams</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div class="P-Article-Preview-Block"&gt;&lt;div class="P-Article-Preview-Block-Content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Invasive predators are responsible for almost 60% of all vertebrate extinctions worldwide with the most vulnerable faunas occurring on islands. The brown treesnake (&lt;i&gt;&lt;span class="tn" data-taxon-parsed-name="Boiga irregularis"&gt;&lt;span class="genus"&gt;Boiga&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="species"&gt;irregularis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;) is a notorious invasive predator that caused the extirpation or extinction of most native forest birds on Guam. The success of avian reintroduction efforts on Guam will depend on whether snake-control techniques sufficiently reduce contact rates between brown treesnakes and reintroduced birds. Mouse-lure traps can successfully reduce brown treesnake populations at local scales. Over a 22-week period both with and without active snake removal, we evaluated snake-trap contact rates for mouse- and bird-lure traps. Bird-lure traps served as a proxy for reintroduced nesting birds. Overall, mouse-lure traps caught more snakes per trap night than did bird-lure traps. However, cameras revealed that bird-lure traps had a snake contact rate almost 15 times greater than the number of successfully captured snakes. Snakes that entered bird-lure traps tended to be larger and in better body condition and were mostly captured in bird-lure traps, despite numerous adjacent mouse-lure traps. Traps placed along grid edges caught more snakes than interior traps, suggesting continuous immigration into the trapping grid within which bird-lure traps were located. Contact between snakes and bird-lure traps was equivalent before and after snake removal, suggesting mouse-lure traps did not adequately reduce the density of snakes that posed a risk to birds, at least at the timescale of this project. This study provides evidence that some snakes exhibit prey selectivity for live birds over live mouse lures. Reliance on a single control tool and lure may be inadequate for support of avian reintroductions and could lead to unintended harvest-driven trait changes of this invasive predator.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3897/neobiota.49.35592</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Pensoft</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Contact rates with nesting birds before and after invasive snake removal: Estimating the effects of trap-based control</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>