<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Stephen C. Ruppel</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Robert G. Loucks</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Paul C. Hackley</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Tongwei Zhang</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Deyong Shao</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Lucy T. Ko</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2018</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div id="abstracts" class="Abstracts u-font-serif"&gt;&lt;div id="ab0005" class="abstract author" lang="en"&gt;&lt;div id="as0005"&gt;&lt;p id="sp0185"&gt;Pore-evolution models from immature organic-matter (OM) -rich Barnett (0.42%R&lt;sub&gt;o&lt;/sub&gt;) and Woodford (0.49%R&lt;sub&gt;o&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;)&amp;nbsp;mudstones&amp;nbsp;were compared with models previously developed from low-maturity OM-lean Boquillas (Eagle Ford-equivalent) mudstones to investigate whether (1) different&amp;nbsp;mineralogy&amp;nbsp;(siliceous vs. calcareous) exerts different catalytic and&amp;nbsp;sorption&amp;nbsp;effects and influences OM-pore origin and evolution; and (2) different types of&amp;nbsp;macerals&amp;nbsp;show different OM pore evolution history. Laboratory gold-tube&amp;nbsp;pyrolysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and thin-section&amp;nbsp;petrography, organic petrography, and geochemical characterization were used to investigate the role of bulk mineralogy, maceral type, and thermal maturation on OM-pore evolution. Results suggest that mineralogy has little impact on OM-pore development and evolution. Macerals, identified using both SEM (platy OM, particulate OM, organic–mineral admixtures,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Tasmanites&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;) and organic&amp;nbsp;petrology&amp;nbsp;(vitrinite,&amp;nbsp;inertinite, amorphous organic matter [AOM]/bituminite, telalginite [&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Leiosphaeridia&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Tasmanites&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;]), do affect the origin and evolution of OM pores owing to differences in chemical compositions, generation&amp;nbsp;kinetics, and activation-energy&amp;nbsp;distributions between&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Tasmanites&lt;/i&gt;, matrix bituminite, and other types of macerals.&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Leiosphaeridia&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;and&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Tasmanites&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;in Woodford mudstone samples exhibit a delay in onset and a shorter period of petroleum generation and pore development compared to the matrix bituminite in the Barnett and Woodford mudstone samples. Pre-oil solid&amp;nbsp;bitumen&amp;nbsp;was observed to have migrated into initial primary mineral pore networks at the bitumen generation stage in both Barnett and Woodford samples. At higher levels of thermal maturation, the volume of primary mineral pores decreases and the pore volume composed of modified mineral pores and OM pores becomes greater. Pore evolution and pore-type heterogeneity in these mudstones is a function of the initial mineral pore network, types of kerogen and macerals, and generation kinetics of individual macerals upon thermal maturation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.coal.2017.10.001</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Pore-types and pore-network evolution in Upper Devonian-Lower Mississippian Woodford and Mississippian Barnett mudstones: Insights from laboratory thermal maturation and organic petrology</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>