<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Kristy Phillips</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Ben Turschak</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Dale Hanson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jason Smith</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>David Warner</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Acoustic surveys were conducted in late summer/early fall during the years 2004-2018 to estimate pelagic prey fish biomass in Lake Michigan. Midwater trawling during the surveys as well as acoustic target strength provided a measure of species and size composition of the fish community for use in scaling acoustic data and providing species-specific abundance estimates. The 2018 survey consisted of 33 acoustic transects 648 km total (403 miles) and 52 midwater trawl tows. Bottom depth at sampling sites ranged from 5 to 245 m (16-804 ft). Mean prey fish biomass density was 8.5 kg/ha, which was 1.9 times higher than in 2017 and 2.4 times the long-term (15 years) mean. The numeric density of the 2018 alewife year-class was 52% of the time series average and 1.8 times the 2017 density. The 2018 cohort was 7% of total alewife biomass (5.2 kg/ha). In 2018 alewife comprised 61% of total prey fish biomass, while rainbow smelt and bloater were 2% and 37% of total biomass, respectively. Small bloater were extremely rare in 2018 and were only caught near Frankfort, Michigan. Their density (&lt; 1 fish/ha) in 2018 was the lowest observed in the 2004-2018 period. Biomass density of rainbow smelt and bloater remain well below observed in the 1980s-1990s. Cisco are infrequently caught in this survey, including the past two years. In 2018 three adult fish were caught (&gt; 400 mm), with two in Grand Traverse Bay and one south of Manistique, Michigan. These results indicate that cisco density is very low at the lake level.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Great Lakes Fishery Commission</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Status of pelagic prey fishes in Lake Michigan, 2018</dc:title>
  <dc:type>text</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>