<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Markus Dyck</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Samuel A. Iverson</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>David S. Lee</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Nicholas J Lunn</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Joseph M Northrup</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Marie-Claude Richer</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Guillaume Szor</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Michael C. Runge</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Eric V. Regehr</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2021</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div id="abstracts" class="Abstracts u-font-serif"&gt;&lt;div id="ab0005" class="abstract author" lang="en"&gt;&lt;div id="as0005"&gt;&lt;p id="sp0035"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Arctic&amp;nbsp;marine mammals&amp;nbsp;are harvested by Indigenous people for subsistence and are socially and culturally important. For ice-dependent species like the polar bear&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Ursus maritimus&lt;/i&gt;, management and conservation require understanding interactions between harvest and sea-ice loss due to climate change. We developed a demographic model to evaluate harvest risk for polar bears in Southern Hudson Bay, Canada, where the annual ice-free season has increased by approximately one month in recent decades. The model was based on the theta-logistic equation and allowed for density-dependent changes (through carrying capacity [&lt;i&gt;K&lt;/i&gt;]) and density-independent changes (through population growth rate [&lt;i&gt;r&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;]). Model parameters were estimated using a Bayesian&amp;nbsp;Monte Carlo method&amp;nbsp;that included capture-recapture,&amp;nbsp;aerial survey, and harvest data. Harvest management followed a state-dependent approach under which new estimates of abundance were used to update the harvest level every five years. Under a middle-of-the-road environmental scenario that assumed&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;K&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;and&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;r&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;would decline in proportion to projected sea-ice declines, annual removal of 0.02–0.03 of females resulted in a 0.8 probability of maintaining subpopulation abundance above maximum net productivity level for three polar bear generations (~34&amp;nbsp;years), our primary criterion for sustainability. Under more pessimistic and optimistic environmental scenarios, comparable female harvest rates were 0.01 and 0.055, respectively. Our coupled modeling-management framework can be used to inform&amp;nbsp;tradeoffs&amp;nbsp;between protection and sustainable use for wildlife populations experiencing habitat loss.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109128</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Incorporating climate change in a harvest risk assessment for polar bears Ursus maritimus in Southern Hudson Bay</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>