<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Amie M.G. Brady</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Christopher M. Kephart</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Vicente Gallardo</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Rebecca N. Bushon</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2021</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div id="abstracts" class="Abstracts u-font-serif"&gt;&lt;div id="ab0005" class="abstract author" lang="en"&gt;&lt;div id="as0005"&gt;&lt;p id="sp0060"&gt;A rapid method that provides information on the viability of organisms is needed to protect public health and ensure that remediation efforts following a release of a biological agent are effective. The rapid viability-polymerase chain reaction (RV-PCR) method combines broth culture and molecular methods to provide results on whether viable organisms are present in less than 15&amp;nbsp;h. In this study, a modified RV-PCR (mRV-PCR) method was compared to a membrane-filtration culture method for the detection of viable&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Bacillus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;spores in water matrices. Samples included small and large volumes of chlorine and non‑chlorine treated tap water. Large volume water samples (up to 100&amp;nbsp;L), were processed by&amp;nbsp;ultrafiltration&amp;nbsp;using a semi-automated waterborne pathogen concentrator, followed by centrifugation as a secondary concentration technique. The concentrated samples were analyzed by mRV-PCR and culture methods. The overall agreement between the mRV-PCR and culture methods when seed concentrations were greater than 10 spores per sample volume analyzed was 96%. The total time from the start of sample processing to the final sample result for the mRV-PCR method was decreased by approximately 2&amp;nbsp;h, in comparison to the previously published RV-PCR method because of the incorporation of shorter, more efficient primary and secondary concentration steps and a shorter&amp;nbsp;DNA extraction&amp;nbsp;technique. Overall, this study confirmed that RV-PCR is a promising approach for identifying viable&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;Bacillus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;spores in small- and large-volume water samples and for producing results in less time than traditional culture methods.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106293</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Evaluation of a modified rapid viability-polymerase chain reaction method for Bacillus atrophaeus spores in water matrices</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>