<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Gary W. Shenk</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Gopal Bhatt</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Kevin Asplen</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Olivia H. Devereux</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Jessica Rigelman</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>J. Hugh Ellis</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Benjamin F Hobbs</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Darrell J Bosch</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>George L Van Houtven</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Arthur E McGarity</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Lewis C. Linker</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>William P. Ball</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Daniel E Kaufman</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2021</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div id="abs0010" class="abstract author" lang="en"&gt;&lt;div id="abssec0010"&gt;&lt;p id="abspara0010"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Extensive efforts to adaptively manage nutrient pollution rely on Chesapeake Bay Program's (Phase 6) Watershed Model, called Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool (CAST), which helps decision-makers plan and track implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs). We describe mathematical characteristics of CAST and develop a constrained nonlinear BMP-subset model, software, and visualization framework. This represents the first publicly available optimization framework for exploring least-cost strategies of&amp;nbsp;pollutant load&amp;nbsp;control for the United States' largest&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;estuary&lt;span&gt;. The optimization identifies implementation options for a BMP subset modeled with load reduction effectiveness factors, and the web interface facilitates interactive exploration of &amp;gt;30,000 solutions organized by objective, nutrient control level, and for ~200 counties. We assess framework performance and demonstrate modeled cost improvements when comparing optimization-suggested proposals with proposals inspired by jurisdiction plans. Stakeholder feedback highlights the framework's current utility for investigating cost-effective&amp;nbsp;tradeoffs&amp;nbsp;and its usefulness as a foundation for future analysis of restoration strategies.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105141</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Supporting cost-effective watershed management strategies for Chesapeake Bay using a modeling and optimization framework</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>