<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Nathan Ranc</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Brian J. Smith</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Peter S. Coates</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Steven R. Mathews</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>David K. Dahlgren</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Simona Picardi</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2021</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div class="JournalAbstract"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Translocated animals undergo a phase of behavioral adjustment after being released in a novel environment, initially prioritizing exploration and gradually shifting toward resource exploitation. This transition has been termed post-release behavioral modification. Post-release behavioral modification may also manifest as changes in habitat selection through time, and these temporal dynamics may differ between individuals. We aimed to evaluate how post-release behavioral modification is reflected in temporal dynamics of habitat selection and its variability across individuals using a population of translocated female greater sage-grouse as a case study. Sage-grouse were translocated from Wyoming to North Dakota (USA) during the summers of 2018–2020. We analyzed individual habitat selection as a function of sagebrush cover, herbaceous cover, slope, and distance to roads. Herbaceous cover is a key foraging resource for sage-grouse during summer; thus, we expected a shift from exploration to exploitation to manifest as temporally-varying selection for herbaceous cover. For each individual sage-grouse (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;= 26), we tested two competing models: a null model with no time-dependence and a model with time-dependent selection for herbaceous cover. We performed model selection at the individual level using an information-theoretic approach. Time-dependence was supported for five individuals, unsupported for seven, and the two models were indistinguishable based on AIC&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;for the remaining fourteen. We found no association between the top-ranked model and individual reproductive status (brood-rearing or not). We showed that temporal dynamics of post-release habitat selection may emerge in some individuals but not in others, and that failing to account for time-dependence may hinder the detection of steady-state habitat selection patterns. These findings demonstrate the need to consider both temporal dynamics and individual variability in habitat selection when conducting post-release monitoring to inform translocation protocols.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.3389/fcosc.2021.703906</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Frontiers</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Individual variation in temporal dynamics of post-release habitat selection</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>