<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:contributor>Kenneth Belitz</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Katherine Marie Ransom</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Peter B. McMahon</dc:contributor>
  <dc:contributor>Paul E. Stackelberg</dc:contributor>
  <dc:creator>Celia Z Rosecrans</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2022</dc:date>
  <dc:description>&lt;div id="ab0005" class="abstract author" lang="en"&gt;&lt;div id="as0005"&gt;&lt;div id="ab0005" class="abstract author" lang="en"&gt;&lt;div id="as0005"&gt;&lt;p id="sp0075"&gt;A random forest regression (RFR) model was applied to over 12,000 wells with measured fluoride (F) concentrations in untreated groundwater to predict F concentrations at depths used for domestic and public supply in basin-fill aquifers of the western United States. The model relied on twenty-two regional-scale environmental and surficial predictor variables selected to represent factors known to control F concentrations in groundwater. The testing model fit R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;and RMSE were 0.52 and 0.78&amp;nbsp;mg/L. Comparisons of measured to predicted proportions of four F-concentrations categories (&amp;lt;0.7&amp;nbsp;mg/L, 0.7–2&amp;nbsp;mg/L, &amp;gt;2&amp;nbsp;mg/L – 4&amp;nbsp;mg/L, and&amp;nbsp;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;4&amp;nbsp;mg/L) indicate that the model performed well at making regional-scale predictions. Differences between measured and predicted proportions indicate underprediction of measured F at values by between 4 and 20&amp;nbsp;mg/L, representing less than 1% of the regional scale predicted values. These residuals most often map to geographic regions where local-scale processes including evaporative discharge in&amp;nbsp;&lt;a class="topic-link" title="Learn more about closed basins from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/structural-basin" data-mce-href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/structural-basin"&gt;closed basins&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;or intermittent streams concentrate fluoride in shallow groundwater. Despite this, the RFR model provides spatially continuous F predictions across the basin-fill aquifers where discrete samples are missing. Further, the predictions capture documented areas that exceed the F maximum contaminant level for drinking water of 4&amp;nbsp;mg/L and areas that are below the oral-health benchmark of 0.7&amp;nbsp;mg/L. These predictions can be used to estimate fluoride concentrations in unmonitored areas and to aid in identifying geographic areas that may require further investigation at localized scales.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div id="ab0010" class="abstract graphical" lang="en"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div id="ab0010" class="abstract graphical" lang="en"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150960</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Predicting regional fluoride concentrations at public and domestic supply depths in basin-fill aquifers of the western United States using a random forest model</dc:title>
  <dc:type>article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>